
Choreography
Caterina Sagna
With
Alessandro Bernardeschi, Clelia Moretti, Caterina Sagna
Music
Chemical Brothers, D. Reinhardt, Massive Attack, Moby, D. Ross, Tindersticks
Costumes
Tobia Ercolino
Light design
Nuccio Marino
Photo
Maarten Vanden Abeele
Production
Associazione Compagnia Caterina Sagna / Kunstencentrum Vooruit (Gent)
______________________________________________________________________________________________
The Lady gets tired easily, suffers from headaches and is always very
busy.
The Lady has a great fear of being ridiculous, gets bored very often,suffers
from depression.
The Lady regularly resorts to sanitary and beauty cares and keeps herself
up to date with the cultural news; she is always adequate.
The Lady’s teeth have no cavities.
The Lady travels often.
The Lady believes kids to be too intrusive and cannot stand cats.
The Lady owns some stock, but she does not remember which ones and gets
nervous reading the daily news.
The Lady has moving and licentious memories.
The Lady does
not cook but knows how to create highly refined menus, she cannot play
golf but goes to the club every week-end, she does not read books but
knows all the authors and titles in the best-seller’s list.
The Lady is always a little cold and in order to get warmer she drinks,
she adores wine.
The Lady never finds what she is looking for.
The Lady has much imagination and great taste.
The Lady is ready for anything.
Caterina Sagna
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Complimentary
flowers for the Lady
Roberto Fratini Serafide,
May 2000
Tu vis? ou vois-je ici l'ombre d'une princesse?
Mallarmé, Hérodiade
E per me stessa nessuna! Nessuna!
Per me, io sono colei che mi si crede.
Pirandello, Così è (se vi pare)
Clumsily
trinitarian in the almost nursing obedience of her two servants who
literally "prepare" her, organic figures in her existence
as well as she is organic to their "resistance" (any high
school memory of Genet must be, therefore, immediately repressed), the
Lady lets herself be written with capital L, because she does not own
a name at all; like God, she finds it altogether hard to determine herself;
and unlike God, she does not stand on ceremony. For this reason maybe
the contracted measure of a dance performance does not exhaust her,
because she is totally partial, fanciful, unfulfilled. What happens
on stage does non illustrate the type of woman rolling in money, or
a snobbish caricature: as far as she appears bathed in drawing-room
languors and in high fashion totems, the Lady is not less absolute,
or less desperate than Herodiades, Melisande or the Dame of Shalott,
all of them "comparative" ladies, too. Nor is she less hopelessly
inconsistent. She also embodies, with fastidious inadequacy, a certain
female, lanky longing to be what she is not, if only she could be something.
She does it by resorting to the easy implements of that upper middle
class described in scandal magazines , in order to emphasize that the
longing, not its object, is what really counts. Too weak, and too little
heroic to pretend to be some kind of novelty, whether saint or charmer
or victim, she does not find any advantage in appearing anything other
than something already seen: to be recognized more than to recognize
herself.
Thus, being the opaque part of that whole which is a woman, she exists
thanks to a few particles of that whole which is high society: vermouth
glasses, pills, dresses, ballroom tunes and unforgiving dance music:
sanctified things, celebrated by fancy, in which, without ever confessing,
the Lady receives Holy Communion. A game is what reproduces the intrigue
of life in the absence of any instrumentality, and of any gravity: the
shadow, Laban might say, of the effort which is existence. In order
to be free from a pragmatic aim, the game must ascribe itself, officially,
a conventional one: game time, score, conquest. The game played by the
Lady has the same prerogatives, and equally tends to infinity: the metamorphoses,
the pick-me-ups, the "hops" reach their goal as points in
a score, within the limits assigned to by the one hour length of the
play; but the frenzy to score as much as possible adds them together
in a sort of parataxis, a speech with no hierarchies, "inconsequential" in the noblest sense of the word.
The climax scene, the keystone, is falsely pursued, and in fact is postponed
to a somewhere else that does not let itself be caught by the tail.
As if, after devoting herself to enrich some chimerical collection of
attitudes and symptoms, the Lady could exhibit nothing but its "sample-cards",
since even she could be listed as a catalogue of anatomical parts, coordinated
but never "orderly".
She might be seen, during the bows, showing a sort of embarrassment
for that game which might have continued, but
which, even by dilating itself to the limits of physical strength, could
never approach life, or a "thesis" on life, with a better
approximation than that of the asymptotes of a parabolic curve to the
vertical and horizontal axes in a Cartesian quadrant.
The Lady has no content, and, in spite of all the tricks to look like
one, she is not yet a form. Rather, she is the temporary content, doomed
to extinction, the mold of the form that is to come and that others
will recognize, except filling her up with further contents: the cloth
wraps her up modeling her like an inert matter around its matrix, and
only then, having found a place in a palimpsest, it shall be called
a dress. And only then, by being everything other than naked, the Lady
reveals herself (in the most religious sense of the expression: to draw
a readable veil on the incommunicable. But if even the latest dogma
of so much avant-garde, the one which equals nudity to truth, has lost
its bite, we will still confide on the compass of the great twilights: "I shall recognize you from your mask".
(Translation
by Mariella Lo Sardo Towner)

|
More
informations about La Signora
|
| |
|
|
see
and download videos of this performance |
|
| see
associated links to this performance |